Editorial Policy
Last updated:
TextToolsAI publishes guides, comparisons, and use-case articles alongside free AI writing tools. Our goal is simple: help people complete a real writing task and choose the right tool for it. This policy explains who writes our content, how we research and review it, how we handle corrections, and how we keep our editorial judgment independent from the ads that fund the site.
Who writes and who reviews
Our articles are written by Clover Elise Winter, a Senior SEO Content Strategist and technical research writer with over six years of experience writing for B2B SaaS, eco-technology, and digital-media brands. Before anything is published, Muhammad Adnan, the founder of TextToolsAI, reviews each draft, checks the claims and examples, and builds and tests the tools the content describes. Every page carries a named byline and links to its author's profile.
How we choose topics
We prioritize the practical jobs people bring to AI writing tools: rewriting paragraphs, summarizing source text, writing better prompts, drafting outreach, improving SEO copy, and polishing grammar. Topics are chosen from real search intent and reader questions, and we favor pages that help someone pick a tool, prepare a better input, or review an output more carefully, over pages that simply chase traffic.
How we research and write
Each article starts from research into the task, the competing pages that already rank, and the questions a reader actually has. We write in plain language, structure pages so the answer comes first, and include worked examples where they make the guidance concrete. We would rather publish one page that genuinely answers a question than several thin pages that circle it.
How we fact-check and cite sources
Factual claims, statistics, and product details are checked against primary and widely-recognized sources, such as official documentation from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, and published research from email and SEO authorities. Figures are attributed to their source or clearly flagged as directional estimates rather than presented as our own results. When we describe a tool's output, we frame it as a first draft for the reader to review, not finished, fact-checked copy.
Examples, comparisons, and claims
Examples are labeled by use case and checked so they do not imply fake results, invented customer stories, or unsupported metrics. In comparisons, we disclose when one of the tools is our own, score on criteria we state openly, and avoid superlatives we cannot support. Pages that touch outreach, SEO, ecommerce, academic, or other professional topics are reviewed for accuracy and responsible use.
Corrections and updates
If something is wrong or unclear, tell us through the Contact page with the URL, the claim in question, and a short explanation. We aim to review correction requests promptly and fix genuine errors as soon as we can. We also review published pages periodically and update them when guidance becomes outdated, examples weaken, links break, or a correction improves the reader's understanding. Each page shows a “Last reviewed” or “Updated” date.
How we make money, and editorial independence
The tools and articles on TextToolsAI are free to use. The site is supported by advertising (Google AdSense). Advertising revenue never decides which tools we recommend, how we score a comparison, or what we conclude in a guide; those judgments are made editorially and independently of any advertiser. We do not accept payment for favorable coverage.
Related standards
This policy works alongside our Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, and How It Works page. Content should be genuinely helpful without overstating what any writing tool can do.