Editorial Policy
TextToolsAI.app publishes tool pages, guides, examples, comparisons, and use-case pages to help people complete practical writing tasks. The goal is to make AI-assisted writing easier to understand, easier to review, and more useful for real workflows.
How topics are selected
Topics are selected based on common writing jobs people bring to AI tools, such as rewriting paragraphs, summarizing source text, writing better prompts, creating outreach drafts, improving SEO copy, and polishing grammar. Priority is given to pages that can help a reader choose a tool, prepare better inputs, or review output more carefully.
How AI-assisted drafts are reviewed
AI may be used to help draft outlines, examples, summaries, or first-pass copy. Drafts should then be reviewed for clarity, accuracy, originality, usefulness, tone, internal link relevance, and whether the page actually answers the reader's task. AI output should not be published without human review.
How examples are checked
Examples should be practical, clearly labeled by use case, and checked so they do not imply fake results, fake customer stories, fake metrics, or unsupported claims. Examples that involve outreach, SEO, ecommerce, academic work, or professional topics should be reviewed for accuracy and responsible use.
Corrections and updates
Corrections can be requested through the Contact page. Include the URL, the text or claim that needs review, and a short explanation. Pages may be updated when wording is unclear, guidance is outdated, examples are weak, links break, or a correction improves the reader's understanding.
Related standards
Editorial pages should work alongside the Disclaimer, Privacy Policy, and How It Works page. Content should be helpful without overstating what AI tools can do.